Dyscalculia vs Math Anxiety: A K-3 Guide for Teachers and Parents

TL;DR: Dyscalculia and math anxiety are two different problems that often get confused — and sometimes co-occur. Dyscalculia is a neurodevelopmental learning disability affecting roughly 3–7% of children, rooted in how the brain processes numbers. Math anxiety is an emotional response — tension, dread, or fear of math — that can strike children as young as five and affects about 17% of the U.S. population. The distinction matters because the interventions differ: dyscalculia needs structured numerical skill-building, while math anxiety responds best to emotion-regulation strategies and lower-stakes practice. About 19% of children with dyscalculia also show high math anxiety, yet 77% of math-anxious children have typical or high math ability. For K-3 teachers and parents, the key is to screen for both, avoid high-pressure timed tests, and recognize when to refer for formal evaluation.

Why K-3 teachers keep asking "is it dyscalculia or anxiety?"

A seven-year-old freezes when the multiplication flashcards come out. She counts on her fingers for 3+4 every single time. Is her brain wired differently, or is she terrified of getting it wrong? That question can have two very different answers — and very different action plans.

Early elementary teachers see both conditions daily, but diagnostic confusion is the norm, not the exception. A landmark study of 1,757 UK students by Devine and colleagues (2018) found that cognitive and emotional math problems "largely dissociate" — meaning most children with math anxiety do not have dyscalculia, and most children with dyscalculia are not primarily anxious. Yet the two conditions feed each other when misidentified, producing children who avoid math, underperform on tests, and internalize the belief that they are "just not math people."

This guide translates research findings into practical frameworks for K-3 classrooms and homes. We cover what each condition actually is, how to tell them apart, what to do when they overlap, and when to escalate to a formal assessment.

What is Dyscalculia?

Dyscalculia is a specific learning disorder affecting how the brain processes numbers and quantities. The DSM-5 classifies it as a "Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in mathematics," while ICD-11 calls it "Developmental Learning Disorder with impairment in mathematics." The diagnosis requires math performance at least one standard deviation below age norms - roughly the bottom 16% - that cannot be explained by low IQ, poor instruction, or sensory problems, as detailed in the German evidence-based S3 guideline by Haberstroh and Schulte-Körne (2019).

Prevalence sits between 3% and 7% of school-age children worldwide, with Kucian and von Aster estimating 3–6% in their European Journal of Pediatrics review (2015). Gender ratios are roughly equal according to Devine et al. (2013).

The neurological differences centers on the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) - a brain region dedicated to magnitude processing. Structural MRI shows reduced gray matter and altered connectivity in parietal, frontal, and occipito-temporal regions in dyscalculic children, and these differences persist longitudinally. Researchers have also proposed the influential "core deficit" hypothesis: dyscalculia reflects an impaired number module — the brain's ability to understand sets and numerosities. A competing view locates the deficit in visuospatial working memory and inhibitory control instead. Both perspectives agree that the root is cognitive, not emotional.

Crucially, dyscalculia does not resolve on its own. A six-year prospective study by Shalev, Manor, and Gross-Tsur (2005) found that 95% of children diagnosed in fifth grade remained in the lowest arithmetic quartile six years later.

For a foundational explainer written for families, see our parent's guide to what dyscalculia is.

What is math anxiety?

Math anxiety is a domain-specific emotional reaction — a feeling of tension, apprehension, or fear that interferes with math performance.

Roughly 17% of the U.S. population experiences high math anxiety, per figures reported by Ashcraft and Moore and re-cited in the meta-analysis by Barroso et al. (2021). Math anxiety is detectable as early as kindergarten. Harari, Vukovic, and Bailey (2013) showed that six- and seven-year-olds already experience math anxiety as a multidimensional construct — negative reactions, worry, and low numerical confidence — and Caviola et al. (2020) validated a short screening scale for this age group.

The neural signature looks very different from dyscalculia. An fMRI study of 7-to-9-year-olds by Young, Wu, and Menon (2012) found amygdala hyperactivity (the brain's fear center) paired with reduced engagement of the IPS and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during arithmetic. The highly anxious children had the same IQ, working memory, and math ability as peers — the anxiety was a separate neural phenomenon, not a reflection of competence.

How does math anxiety develop in the first place? The research points to three culprits working together:

• Teacher math anxiety.Beilock et al. (2010) showed that first- and second-grade girls taught by math-anxious female teachers ended the year with lower math scores and stronger gender stereotypes. Over 90% of U.S. early-elementary teachers are women, making this a systemic risk.

• Parent math anxiety during homework.Maloney et al. (2015) found that when math-anxious parents helped frequently with math homework, their first- and second-graders learned less math across the year and became more anxious themselves. The transmission pathway is the interaction, not genetics alone.

• Working memory load under pressure.Ramirez et al. (2013) demonstrated that anxiety hits hardest in children with high working memory — precisely because anxious worry consumes the cognitive resources they rely on, leaving them nearly half a school year behind less-anxious peers.

For the home angle, our article on how parents accidentally increase math anxiety covers the behaviors to avoid.

Key differences at a glance

Dyscalculia is a wiring issue. Math anxiety is a wiring-plus-feeling issue. Here is how researchers differentiate them:

The behavioral contrast is sharpest under pressure. A child with pure math anxiety often does fine on homework and falls apart during a timed test. A child with pure dyscalculia shows the same errors whether the setting is relaxed or formal — finger counting for 3+4 at age eight, miscounting dots in a ten-frame, confusing "bigger" and "smaller" numbers.

Where dyscalculia and math anxiety overlap

The two conditions are dissociable but deeply entangled. Devine and colleagues' 2018 study is the definitive source on comorbidity: in their sample of 1,757 children, about 19% of those with dyscalculia also had high math anxiety, and children with dyscalculia were roughly twice as likely to be math-anxious as their typically achieving peers. But the headline finding cut the other way too — 77% of highly math-anxious children had typical or above-average math performance. Math anxiety is not a proxy for low math ability.

What drives the overlap? Three complementary models are debated in the literature, summarized by Carey et al. (2016):

1. Reduced competency / deficit model. Poor math skills breed anxiety over time. Rubinsten and Tannock (2010) provided the first empirical evidence that children with dyscalculia already show implicit math anxiety, suggesting the skill deficit comes first and the anxiety follows.

2. Debilitating anxiety model. Anxiety disrupts working memory mid-task. Ashcraft and Kirk (2001) showed this crash happens especially when problems require the central executive (like carrying in addition).

3. Genetic diathesis. A twin study by Wang et al. (2014) attributed about 40% of math-anxiety variance to genetic factors, including risks shared with general anxiety and risks tied independently to math cognition. Some children inherit a dual vulnerability.

The evidence now favors a reciprocal loop: early skill struggles breed anxiety, anxiety further erodes performance via working-memory disruption, and the cycle compounds. Encouragingly, Supekar et al. (2015) showed that eight weeks of one-on-one cognitive tutoring in 7-to-9-year-olds both improved skills and normalized amygdala hyperactivity — strong evidence that fixing the competency often fixes the anxiety too.

For more on how the two interact in neurodiverse learners, see our piece on math anxiety in autism, ADHD, and dyscalculia.

Signs to watch for in K-3 classrooms

K-3 is the right window. Kindergarten number sense — counting, magnitude comparison, number-word mapping — accounts for roughly 66% of the variance in first-grade math achievement, according to the longitudinal work of Jordan et al. (2010) and Geary et al. (2012). If you catch it early, you change the trajectory.

Red flags for dyscalculia (consistent across settings, persist despite good teaching):

• Difficulty connecting the numeral "4" with four objects, well past kindergarten

• Slow or inaccurate counting; subitizing (instant recognition of 2–4 dots) is impaired

• Confusion over "which number is bigger" even with small quantities

• Persistent finger-counting for simple facts (5+3) into second and third grade

• Trouble understanding place value and number-line position

• Frequent errors transcoding between spoken and written numbers ("seventy-four" written as "704")

• Reading and other subjects are fine

Our checklist for families on signs your child may have dyscalculia expands on each of these. Note also that bright, verbal children frequently go undetected because their language skills mask the numerical deficit, a pattern we unpack in how schools miss dyscalculia in bright or verbal kids.

Red flags for math anxiety (state-dependent, often tied to evaluation):

• Physical complaints (stomachaches, headaches) specifically before math class or tests

• Visible distress — tears, withdrawal, shutdown — when math appears

• Large gap between homework performance and timed-test performance

• Self-talk like "I'm dumb at math" or "I'm not a math person," sometimes verbatim from adults

• Avoidance: asking to go to the bathroom during math, pretending not to hear instructions

• Reverting to immature strategies (finger counting) when they can do better on a good day

Validated tools exist for both. For math anxiety in K-3, the Math Anxiety Scale for Young Children (MASYC-R) from Ganley and McGraw (2016), the Scale for Early Mathematics Anxiety (SEMA) from Wu et al. (2012), and the EES-AMAS from Caviola et al. (2020) are well-validated. For dyscalculia, brief screeners like Jordan's Number Sense Brief Screener and the Butterworth Dyscalculia Screener are the standard starting points.

A useful diagnostic frame is the 2×2 matrix: screen each child for math performance and math emotion. The four quadrants tell you what you are dealing with — low-math performance children warrant formal dyscalculia assessment; high-math performance/high-anxiety children need emotional support, not skill remediation.

Evidence-based strategies for teachers and parents

For suspected dyscalculia, the intervention literature is clear on what works. Haberstroh and Schulte-Körne's 2019 meta-analysis of 48 trials found symptom-specific interventions — practicing the actual math content, not generic working-memory drills — produced an average effect size of Hedges' g = 0.52. A newer meta-analysis by Mehari (2025) of 33 studies in 6-to-12-year-olds reported an even larger pooled effect (g = 0.93). The practical recipe:

• Concrete-representational-abstract sequencing. Start with physical manipulatives (counters, ten-frames, rekenreks), move to drawings, then to symbols. Our full walkthrough of the CRA method covers the sequence in depth.

• Number-line training. Spatial-magnitude activities produced both behavioral improvements and measurable changes in IPS activation in the Kucian lab's Calcularis studies.

• Subitizing practice. Building instant recognition of small quantities addresses the root number-sense deficit; our guide to what subitizing is gives classroom-ready activities.

• Individual or small-group sessions of 45+ minutes. Haberstroh's meta-analysis found group settings and shorter sessions actually produced negative effect sizes.

• Explicit strategy instruction for fact retrieval, replacing counting with decomposition ("8+4 = 8+2+2") gradually.

For targeted number-sense work, see our article on building number sense in kids with dyscalculia.

For math anxiety, a different toolkit applies. A 2023 meta-analysis of 50 intervention studies by Sammallahti et al. found moderate effects for both reducing anxiety (g = –0.47) and improving performance (g = +0.50), with cognitive and emotion-regulation approaches working best. Codding et al. (2023) clarified the split: therapeutic interventions reduce anxiety more, skill interventions improve achievement more, and combining both is optimal.

Practical moves that show up across studies:

• Reduce timed, high-stakes evaluation in K-3. The benefit on speed is rarely worth the anxiety cost.

• Normalize mistakes explicitly. Children with anxious self-talk need repeated evidence that errors are information, not verdicts.

• Use reappraisal language. Teach kids that a racing heart means their body is ready, not that they are failing.

• Structured home math routines.Berkowitz et al. (2015) showed the Bedtime Math app raised first-graders' achievement, with the largest gains in families where parents were math-anxious. Schaeffer et al. (2018) followed up and found the effect eliminated the parent-to-child anxiety transmission, sustained into second grade. Structured, low-pressure parent–child math interactions genuinely break the cycle.

• Teachers should audit their own math anxiety. Given the Beilock (2010) findings on female-teacher transmission, professional development that reduces teacher math anxiety protects the next cohort of girls.

When the two conditions co-occur, the Supekar et al. (2015) evidence argues for leading with skill tutoring - remediation of competence tends to bring the anxiety down with it - while simultaneously removing high-pressure triggers.

When to seek professional help

Some thresholds should trigger escalation rather than more classroom support:

• Persistent low math achievement (below the 10th–16th percentile) despite at least one semester of targeted, high-quality instruction

• Normal performance in other subjects but consistent math-specific struggle — the hallmark pattern of dyscalculia

• Physical anxiety symptoms (vomiting, school refusal, panic) tied specifically to math

• Stagnation or regression across a full school year

• Family history of dyscalculia, dyslexia, or math-learning disabilities, given the heritable component

A comprehensive evaluation typically involves a school psychologist or educational neuropsychologist and includes standardized math achievement measures, cognitive testing (IQ, working memory, processing speed), and math-specific screeners. Formal identification matters because dyscalculia typically qualifies a child for an IEP or 504 plan with specific accommodations — while math anxiety alone usually does not, even when it is debilitating.

FAQs

Can a child have both dyscalculia and math anxiety?

Yes. Roughly 19% of children with dyscalculia also meet criteria for high math anxiety, according to Devine et al. (2018). In these cases, skill-based intervention is typically the priority because improving competency tends to reduce anxiety as a secondary benefit (Supekar et al., 2015).

At what age can dyscalculia be diagnosed?

Reliable behavioral markers appear in kindergarten and first grade, but formal diagnosis typically waits until grade 2 or 3, once sufficient exposure to math instruction has occurred. Early screening — Jordan's Number Sense Brief Screener, for example — can flag at-risk children in kindergarten.

Is math anxiety just a phase kids grow out of?

Not usually. Longitudinal work from Gunderson et al. (2018) shows reciprocal, self-reinforcing cycles between math anxiety and math achievement starting in first grade. Without intervention, anxiety tends to compound rather than fade.

Does a child with dyscalculia have low intelligence?

No. Dyscalculia is defined as a specific learning disorder — math difficulty in the presence of normal IQ and adequate schooling. Many dyscalculic children are highly verbal, creative, or strong in other academic areas.

Will timed math drills help my child memorize facts faster?

For most K-3 children, no. Timed drills raise anxiety, consume working memory, and reduce strategy sophistication, per Ramirez et al. (2016). Low-pressure, spaced practice using manipulatives and games builds the same fluency without the emotional cost.

What is the single best thing parents can do at home?

Engage in structured, low-pressure math conversations — reading math story problems, counting in daily routines, playing math games — rather than acting as homework enforcers. The Bedtime Math studies show this is especially powerful in math-anxious families. Apps like Monster Math provide a safe, self-paced environment for kids to improve Math skills without the math anxiety.

How is dyscalculia different from "just struggling with math"?

Dyscalculia is severe (typically bottom 7–16%), persistent (stable across years), and math-specific (reading and other subjects are intact). General math struggle tends to improve with better instruction; dyscalculia requires targeted, intensive intervention.

Do boys and girls experience these differently?

Dyscalculia prevalence is roughly equal across sexes. Math anxiety is equally prevalent at ages 6–7 (Caviola et al., 2020) but diverges later, with girls reporting more math anxiety in upper elementary and beyond — a gap partly traceable to teacher and parent influence (Beilock et al., 2010).

Conclusion

The real gift of separating dyscalculia from math anxiety is that it protects children from the wrong intervention. A dyscalculic child subjected to pep talks and relaxation exercises will still fail at arithmetic. A math-anxious child drilled harder on facts will panic more. The research makes the path forward concrete: screen for both, separately, using validated tools; match the intervention to the actual profile; and front-load the work in K-3, when the brain and the habits are both still plastic.

Perhaps the most hopeful finding across this literature is the Supekar (2015) result — that cognitive tutoring can normalize amygdala hyperactivity in anxious kids — paired with the Berkowitz and Schaeffer studies showing that a simple structured home routine can neutralize parental math anxiety's effect on children. The mechanisms are separable, but so are the fixes. K-3 teachers and parents who name the problem correctly can change the trajectory of a child's entire mathematical life.

References

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://www.mccc.edu/~jenningh/Courses/documents/math_anxiety.pdf

Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 224–237. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/xge1302224.pdf

Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147(2), 134–168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8300863/

Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2836676/

Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350(6257), 196–198. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26450209/

Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332(6033), 1049–1053. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21617068/

Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. (2016). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1987. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4703847/

Caviola, S., Primi, C., Chiesi, F., & Mammarella, I. C. (2020). The Early Elementary School Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (EES-AMAS). Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1014. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253683/

Codding, R. S., Scalise, N. R., Ramirez, E. M., Yamada, M. T., & Fiorella, L. (2023). Meta-analysis of skill-based and therapeutic interventions to address math anxiety. Journal of School Psychology, 100, 101229. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37689437/

Devine, A., Hill, F., Carey, E., & Szűcs, D. (2018). Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 431–444. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/25112f2c-e263-432f-8e75-57f36c189892

Devine, A., Soltész, F., Nobes, A., Goswami, U., & Szücs, D. (2013). Gender differences in developmental dyscalculia depend on diagnostic criteria. Learning and Instruction, 27, 31–39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4461157/

Ganley, C. M., & McGraw, A. L. (2016). The development and validation of a revised version of the Math Anxiety Scale for Young Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181

Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4855881/

Gunderson, E. A., Park, D., Maloney, E. A., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Reciprocal relations among motivational frameworks, math anxiety, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1421538

Haberstroh, S., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). The diagnosis and treatment of dyscalculia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 116(7), 107–114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6440373/

Harari, R. R., Vukovic, R. K., & Bailey, S. P. (2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: An exploratory study. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 538–555. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Mathematics-Anxiety-in-Young-Children%3A-An-Study-Harari-Vukovic/8a0fb583a20323bb75af8dab5522287d4a1ddaa2

Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2805933/

Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00229.x

Kucian, K., & von Aster, M. (2015). Developmental dyscalculia. European Journal of Pediatrics, 174(1), 1–13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25529864/

Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents' math anxiety on children's math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480–1488. https://cogdevlab.uchicago.edu/files/2019/06/Maloney-Intergenerational-Effects-of-Parents-Math-Anxiety.pdf

McCaskey, U., von Aster, M., O'Gorman, R., & Kucian, K. (2020). Persistent differences in brain structure in developmental dyscalculia: A longitudinal morphometry study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 272. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379856/

Mehari, T. G. (2025). Effectiveness of interventions for school children with developmental dyscalculia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396565930

Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem-solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83–100. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26342473/

Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202. https://sites.temple.edu/cognitionlearning/files/2013/09/Ramirez-et-al-2013.pdf

Rubinsten, O., & Tannock, R. (2010). Mathematics anxiety in children with developmental dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6, 46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2913999/

Sammallahti, E., Finell, J., Jonsson, B., & Korhonen, J. (2023). A meta-analysis of math anxiety interventions. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(2), 346–362. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1400784.pdf

Schaeffer, M. W., Rozek, C. S., Berkowitz, T., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2018). Disassociating the relation between parents' math anxiety and children's math achievement: Long-term effects of a math app intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1782–1790. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30284862/

Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47(2), 121–125. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15707235/

Suárez-Pellicioni, M., Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Colomé, À. (2016). Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 3–22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13415-015-0370-7

Supekar, K., Iuculano, T., Chen, L., & Menon, V. (2015). Remediation of childhood math anxiety and associated neural circuits through cognitive tutoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(36), 12574–12583. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4563039/

Szűcs, D., Devine, A., Soltész, F., Nobes, A., & Gabriel, F. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49(10), 2674–2688. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3878850/

Wang, Z., Hart, S. A., Kovas, Y., Lukowski, S., Soden, B., Thompson, L. A., Plomin, R., McLoughlin, G., Bartlett, C. W., Lyons, I. M., & Petrill, S. A. (2014). Who is afraid of math? Two sources of genetic variance for mathematical anxiety. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(9), 1056–1064. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4636726/

Wu, S. S., Barth, M., Amin, H., Malcarne, V., & Menon, V. (2012). Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 162. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162/full

Young, C. B., Wu, S. S., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23(5), 492–501. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3462591/